History & Civics
The Simon Commission was appointed in November 1927 by the British Government. Subsequently the Civil Disobedience Movement began. In this context answer the following questions:
(a) Why was the Simon Commission appointed by the British Government? Why did the Congress boycott the Commission?
(b) The Civil Disobedience Movement was launched by Gandhiji with his famous Dandi March. Mention the significance of this historic event.
(c) Why did Gandhiji suspend Civil Disobedience Movement in 1931 and later in 1934 call it off?
Answer
(a) In November 1927, the British Government appointed the Indian Statutory Commission, popularly known as the Simon Commission, to investigate the need for further constitutional reforms. The Commission was composed of seven British members of Parliament.
The commission had no Indian member. This was seen as a violation of the principle of self-determination and a deliberate insult to the self-respect of the Indians. Hence, at its Madras session in 1927, presided over by Dr. Ansari, the National Congress decided to boycott the commission 'at every stage and in every form'.
(b) Gandhiji started the Civil Disobedience Movement with his famous Dandi March.
- On 12th March, Mahatma Gandhi began the historic march from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi, a village on the Gujarat sea coast.
- A number of people followed him.
- On the morning of 6th April, Gandhiji violated the Salt Law at Dandi by picking up some salt left by the sea waves.
- According to the Salt Law, the government had the monopoly to manufacture and sell salt.
- He had selected to attack the Salt Laws because the salt-tax affected all sections of society, especially the poor.
- Gandhiji's breaking of the Salt Laws marked the beginning of the Civil Disobedience Movement.
(c) Since the satyagraha could not be suppressed, the Government, through Tej Bahadur Sapru and Jayakar, started negotiations with Gandhiji in jail.
- This resulted in the signing of a pact by Gandhiji and Lord Irwin, the Viceroy, in March 1931.
- This is known as the Gandhi-Irwin Pact.
- According to the terms of the pact, the Congress consented to suspend the Civil Disobedience Movement in 1931.
- The Great Depression of 1930s in the world had hit the farmers in India.
- Gandhiji sought an interview with Viceroy Willingdon. The interview was refused.
- The Congress passed a resolution for the renewal of the Civil Disobedience Movement.
- Government resorted to repression, issued Ordinances and assumed special powers.
- The Congress was declared illegal.
- Congress leaders were arrested and their properties were seized. Communalism was fanned.
- Gradually the Civil Disobedience Movement lost its force and Congress called it off in 1934.
Related Questions
Why did congress decide to resume the Civil Disobedience Movement in January 1932?
Gandhiji introduced new ideas in politics and adopted new methods to give a new direction to the political movement. In this context, answer the following questions:
(a) What was Gandhiji's doctrine of Satyagraha?
(b) Explain briefly Gandhiji's Social Ideals.
(c) Which mass struggle was launched by him on non-violent lines in 1920? Explain in brief the programmes of such a campaign.
Read the excerpt given below and answer the questions that follow:
“General Dyer’s action at Jallianwala Bagh appears to have been entirely indefensible. He acted after open disorder had ceased in the city for two days; he gave no warning on the spot, but began firing within 30 seconds (of arriving); and he was responsible for grave and unnecessary slaughter. His plea is that he wanted to produce sufficient moral effect throughout the Punjab. Such was not his duty and the effect he has really produced is to create, not only in the Punjab, but throughout India, a bitterness that will take years to eradicate.”
— Lovat Fraser (1871-1926) British journalist(a) The action of General Dyer mentioned in this article led to the launch of which movement? State briefly the other causes of the movement.
(b) What was the impact of this movement on the Indian National Movement?
(c) What led to the withdrawal of this movement? What was Gandhiji’s view about the withdrawal?
Read the excerpt given below and answer the questions that follow:
Being conscientiously of opinion that the Bills known as the Indian Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill No. I of 1919 and the Criminal Law (Emergency Powers) Bill No. II of 1919 are unjust, subversive of the principles of liberty and justice, and destructive of the elementary right of individuals on which the safety of the community, as a whole, and the State itself is based, we solemnly affirm that in the event of these Bills becoming law and until they are withdrawn, we shall refuse civility to obey these laws and such other laws as a Committee to be hereafter appointed may think fit, and we further affirm that in this struggle we will faithfully follow truth and refrain from violence to life, person or property.
—The Bombay Chronicle, March 4, 1920
(a) What name was given to the two Indian Criminal Law Bills mentioned in the excerpt above? Why have they been described as unjust?
(b) Which movement was started in 1920 after these bills were passed in the Central Legislature? State any two objectives of this movement.