Mathematics
Assertion (A): The rationalising factor of 2 + is 2 - .
Reason (R): Both 2 + and 2 - are surds.
Assertion (A) is true, Reason (R) is false.
Assertion (A) is false, Reason (R) is true.
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason (R) is the correct reason for Assertion (A).
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct reason (or explanation) for Assertion (A).
Rational Numbers
2 Likes
Answer
Multiplying 2 + and 2 -
Since, 1 is a rational number.
Thus, we can say that the rationalising factor of 2 + is 2 - .
∴ Assertion (A) is true.
A surd is an irrational root of a rational number.
Thus, 2 + and 2 - are irrational numbers containing surds , but not surd itself.
∴ Reason (R) is false.
Hence, option 1 is the correct option.
Answered By
2 Likes
Related Questions
Assertion (A): is an irrational number.
Reason (R): Any real number that can be expressed in the form of where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factor except 1 is a rational number.
Assertion (A) is true, Reason (R) is false.
Assertion (A) is false, Reason (R) is true.
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason (R) is the correct reason for Assertion (A).
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct reason (or explanation) for Assertion (A).
Assertion (A): All surds are irrational numbers.
Reason (R): All irrational numbers are surds.
Assertion (A) is true, Reason (R) is false.
Assertion (A) is false, Reason (R) is true.
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason (R) is the correct reason for Assertion (A).
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct reason (or explanation) for Assertion (A).
Without actual division, find whether the following rational numbers are terminating decimals or recurring decimals :
In case of terminating decimals, write their decimal expansions.
Express the following recurring decimals as vulgar fractions :
(i)
(ii)