History
Representatives of the Third Estate take the oath raising their arms in the direction of Bailly, the President of the Assembly, standing on a table in the centre. Do you think that during the actual event Bailly would have stood with his back to the assembled deputies? What could have been David’s intention in placing Bailly the way he has done?
French Revolution
6 Likes
Answer
In the actual event, I don't think Bailly would have stood with his back to the assembled deputies. Instead, he would have been facing them, presiding over the proceedings.
Jacques-Louis David, the artist, made several artistic choices in his depiction of the Tennis Court Oath. Here are a few possible reasons for his depiction of Bailly with his back to the assembly:
- Dramatic Composition — By positioning Bailly with his back to the viewer and facing the assembly, David creates a focal point that draws the viewer's eye to the passionate and unified gesture of the deputies. This composition emphasizes the collective nature of the oath rather than focusing on a single individual.
- Symbolic Leadership — Bailly’s raised hand and central position symbolize leadership and the act of administering the oath. This placement underscores his role as the facilitator of this historic moment without detracting from the collective action of the deputies.
- Perspective and Depth — This orientation allows David to include a wide array of expressive gestures and faces in the background, highlighting the diversity and unity of the deputies. It adds depth and dynamism to the scene.
- Emphasis on Unity — By facing the assembly, Bailly symbolizes the direction of their collective will and purpose. It visually represents the deputies coming together in a unified act of defiance and resolution against the monarchy.
Answered By
3 Likes
Related Questions
Fill in the blank boxes in Fig. 4 with appropriate terms from among the following:
Food riots, scarcity of grain, increased number of deaths, rising food prices, weaker bodies. 
What message is Young trying to convey here? Whom does he mean when he speaks of ‘slaves’? Who is he criticising? What dangers does he sense in the situation of 1787?
Source A
Accounts of lived experiences in the Old Regime
- Georges Danton, who later became active in revolutionary politics, wrote to a friend in 1793, looking back upon the time when he had just completed his studies:
‘I was educated in the residential college of Plessis. There I was in the company of important men … Once my studies ended, I was left with nothing. I started looking for a post. It was impossible to find one at the law courts in Paris. The choice of a career in the army was not open to me as I was not a noble by birth, nor did I have a patron. The church too could not offer me a refuge. I could not buy an office as I did not possess a sou. My old friends turned their backs to me … the system had provided us with an education without however offering a field where our talents could be utilised.’ - An Englishman, Arthur Young, travelled through France during the years from 1787 to 1789 and wrote detailed descriptions of his journeys. He often commented on what he saw.
‘He who decides to be served and waited upon by slaves, ill-treated slaves at that, must be fully aware that by doing so he is placing his property and his life in a situation which is very different from that he would be in, had he chosen the services of free and welltreated men. And he who chooses to dine to the accompaniment of his victims’ groans, should not complain if during a riot his daughter gets kidnapped or his son’s throat is slit.’
- Georges Danton, who later became active in revolutionary politics, wrote to a friend in 1793, looking back upon the time when he had just completed his studies:
Identify the symbols in Box 1 which stand for liberty, equality and fraternity.
Explain the meaning of the painting of the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen (Fig. 8) by reading only the symbols.
