History & Civics
(I) Lord Dalhousie justified the annexation of Awadh as “for the good of the governed.”
(II) The people of Awadh had to pay higher land revenue and additional taxes on food, houses and ferries.
- (II) contradicts (I)
- (II) is the reason for (I)
- (I) is true but (II) is false
- (I) and (II) are independent of each other
Revolt 1857
78 Likes
Answer
(II) contradicts (I)
Explanation : Lord Dalhousie claimed that he annexed Awadh for "the good of the governed" — meaning the annexation was supposed to benefit the people of Awadh. But Statement (II) shows us the opposite reality — after annexation, the people of Awadh had to pay higher land revenue and extra taxes on food, houses and ferries, which made their lives harder, not better. So the actual condition of the people directly contradicts Dalhousie's claim. Hence, (II) contradicts (I).
Answered By
44 Likes
Related Questions
(I) Although these revolts were local, scattered and isolated, they established a local tradition of struggle against the foreign rule.
(II) From mid-18th century till 1857, one part of the country or the other rose in revolt against the British policies which harmed the interests of the Indians belonging to all the segments of Indian society.
- (II) contradicts (I)
- (II) is the reason for (I)
- (I) is true but (II) is false
- (I) and (II) are independent of each other
(I) The British policy of territorial expansion and gradual annexation of the native Indian States was one of the major grievances of the Indian rulers.
(II) Some States were brought under British control without actually being annexed.
- (II) contradicts (I)
- (II) is the reason for (I)
- (I) is true but (II) is false
- (I) and (II) are independent of each other
(I) The British introduced modern innovations like railways and telegraph in India in the mid-19th century.
(II) The British introduced these innovations to modernise India.
- (II) contradicts (I)
- (II) is the reason for (I)
- (I) is true but (II) is false
- (I) and (II) are independent of each other
(I) The Indian soldiers, who helped East India Company to establish the British Empire in India, were poorly paid, ill-fed and badly housed.
(II) A large proportion of British Army consisted of Indian Soldiers.
- (II) contradicts (I)
- (II) is the reason for (I)
- (I) is true but (II) is false
- (I) and (II) are independent of each other