History & Civics
What would have happened in case the Surat Split did not occur and the Assertive Nationalists were suppressed?
2ⁿᵈ Phase of INM
3 Likes
Answer
If the Surat Split of 1907 had not occurred and the Assertive Nationalists like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai and Bipin Chandra Pal were suppressed, the following could have happened:
- There would have been no mass participation and the movement would have remained limited to the educated class only, with slow progress.
- No mass awakening.
- Without the Assertive Nationalists, Indians would have continued to depend on British goodwill for reforms rather than demanding their rights boldly.
- The Assertive Nationalists who popularised the ideas of Swadeshi and Boycott of British goods. Without them, these powerful weapons of protest would never have been widely adopted.
- Without the aggressive and bold approach of the Assertive Nationalists, the spirit of complete independence would never have taken root in the minds of the people.
Answered By
1 Like
Related Questions
Read the excerpt given below and answer the questions that follow:
It is a mistake to suppose that the Swadeshi movement requires sacrifice from poor people. We, the middle classes are the greatest offenders in this respect. The poor Kumbi villagers, require not many foreign articles at all, — probably none at all. It is we, the middle classes, who are the consumers of foreign goods; and since this Government is not going to stop the drain by imposing a protective duty it becomes imperatively necessary to adopt a measure by which we can do ourselves what the Government is bound to do and what the government ought to have done long ago. That one point was self-help and another point was determination; and the third sacrifice. You will find that all this included in this resolution, joined with the declaration made in the Presidential address that Swadeshism is a forced necessity in India owing to unnatural economic conditions in India, makes up a complete case for you. I trust that resolution of self-help adopted this year will form the basis of other resolutions of self-help in years to come.’
— Bal Gangadhar Tilak (At the 1906 session of Indian National Congress, where the resolution on Swadeshi was moved.).
(a) What was the main aim of Swadeshi as referred to in the extract? How does, it relate to 'boycott'?
(b) What are the reasons for focussing on Swadeshi?
(c) In what ways is the speaker of this extract the forerunner of Gandhiji?
Study the pictures given below and answer the questions that follow:
(a) Identify the persons 'A' and 'B' given above. To which section of the Congress did each belong and what were their ultimate objectives?
(b) State three different methods of struggle adopted by each section of the Congress.
(c) State two contributions of persons 'A' and 'B' to the freedom struggle.
Imagine you are a young boy of 10 years living in Kolkata in 1905. Describe the Anti-Partition Movement as you saw it.
Is the Swadeshi Movement on a path to revival with the 'Make in India' scheme launched by the Indian government? List initiatives that aim at making India self reliant and a global leader