Class - 9 ML Aggarwal Understanding ICSE Mathematics
Exercise 1.2
Question 1
Prove that 5 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 5 be a rational number, then
5=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒5=q2p2⇒p2=5q2....(i)
As 5 divides 5q2, so 5 divides p2 but 5 is prime
⇒5 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 5m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(5m)2=5q2⇒25m2=5q2⇒5m2=q2
As 5 divides 5m2, so 5 divides q2 but 5 is prime
⇒5 divides q(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 5. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 5 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 5 is an irrational number.
Question 2
Prove that 7 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 7 be a rational number, then
7=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒7=q2p2⇒p2=7q2....(i)
As 7 divides 7q2, so 7 divides p2 but 7 is prime
⇒7 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 7m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(7m)2=7q2⇒49m2=7q2⇒7m2=q2
As 7 divides 7m2, so 7 divides q2 but 7 is prime
⇒7 divides q(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 7. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 7 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 7 is an irrational number.
Question 3
Prove that 6 is an irrational number.
Answer
Suppose that 6 is a rational number, then
6=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒6=q2p2⇒p2=6q2....(i)
As 2 divides 6q2, so 2 divides p2 but 2 is prime
⇒2 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 2k, where k is some integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(2k)2=6q2⇒4k2=6q2⇒2k2=3q2
As 2 divides 2k2, so 2 divides 3q2
⇒ 2 divides 3 or 2 divides q2
But 2 does not divide 3, therefore, 2 divides q2
⇒ 2 divides q (Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 2. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, our supposition is wrong. Therefore, 6 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 6 is an irrational number.
Question 4
Prove that 111 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 111 be a rational number, then
111=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒111=q2p2⇒q2=11p2....(i)
As 11 divides 11p2, so 11 divides q2 but 11 is prime
⇒11 divides q(Theorem 1)
Let q = 11m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of q in (i), we get
(11m)2=11p2⇒121m2=11p2⇒11m2=p2
As 11 divides 11m2, so 11 divides p2 but 11 is prime
⇒11 divides p(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 11. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 111 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 111 is an irrational number.
Question 5
Prove that 2 is an irrational number. Hence, show that 3−2 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 2 be a rational number, then
2=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒2=q2p2⇒p2=2q2....(i)
As 2 divides 2q2, so 2 divides p2 but 2 is prime
⇒2 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 2m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(2m)2=2q2⇒4m2=2q2⇒2m2=q2
As 2 divides 2m2, so 2 divides q2 but 2 is prime
⇒2 divides q(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 2. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 2 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 2 is an irrational number.
Suppose that 3−2 is a rational number, say r.
Then, 3−2 = r (note that r ≠ 0)
⇒−2=r−3⇒2=3−r
As r is rational and r ≠ 0, so 3 - r is rational
⇒2 is rational
But this contradicts that 2 is irrational. Hence, our supposition is wrong.
∴ 3−2 is an irrational number.
Question 6
Prove that 3 is an irrational number. Hence, show that 523 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 3 be a rational number, then
3=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒3=q2p2⇒p2=3q2....(i)
As 3 divides 3q2, so 3 divides p2 but 3 is prime
⇒3 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 3m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(3m)2=3q2⇒9m2=3q2⇒3m2=q2
As 3 divides 3m2, so 3 divides q2 but 3 is prime
⇒3 divides q(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 3. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 3 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 3 is an irrational number.
Suppose that 523 is a rational number, say r.
Then, 523 = r (note that r ≠ 0)
⇒3=25r
As r is rational and r ≠ 0, so 25r is rational [∵ System of rational numbers is closed under all four fundamental arithmetic operations (except division by zero)]
⇒3 is rational
But this contradicts that 3 is irrational. Hence, our supposition is wrong.
∴ 523 is an irrational number.
Question 7
Prove that 5 is an irrational number. Hence, show that −3+25 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 5 be a rational number, then
5=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒5=q2p2⇒p2=5q2
As 5 divides 5q2, so 5 divides p2 but 5 is prime
⇒5 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 5m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(5m)2=5q2⇒25m2=5q2⇒5m2=q2
As 5 divides 5m2, so 5 divides q2 but 5 is prime
⇒5 divides q(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 5. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 5 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 5 is an irrational number.
Suppose that −3+25 is a rational number, say r.
Then, −3+25 = r (note that r ≠ 0)
⇒25=r+3⇒5=2r+3
As r is rational and r ≠ 0, so 2r+3 is rational
⇒5 is rational
But this contradicts that 5 is irrational. Hence, our supposition is wrong.
∴ −3+25 is an irrational number.
Question 8
Prove that the following numbers are irrational:
(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)5+23−5323−72+5
Answer
(i) 5+2
Let us assume that 5+2 is a rational number, say r.
Then,
5+2=r⇒2=r−5
As r is rational, r - 5 is rational
⇒2 is rational
But this contradicts the fact that 2 is irrational.
Hence, our assumption is wrong.
∴ 5+2 is an irrational number.
(ii) 3−53
Let us assume that 3−53 is a rational number, say r.
Then,
3−53=r⇒53=3−r⇒3=53−r
As r is rational, 3 - r is rational
⇒53−r is rational
⇒3 is rational
But this contradicts the fact that 3 is irrational.
Hence, our assumption is wrong.
∴ 3−53 is an irrational number.
(iii) 23−7
Let us assume that 23−7 is a rational number, say r.
Then,
23−7=r⇒23=r+7⇒3=2r+7
As r is rational, r + 7 is rational
⇒2r+7 is rational
⇒3 is rational
But this contradicts the fact that 3 is irrational.
Hence, our assumption is wrong.
∴ 23−7 is an irrational number.
(iv) 2+5
Let us assume that 2+5 is a rational number, say r.