History & Civics
(I) The British government took a large part of the farmers’ produce in the form of land revenue and other taxes.
(II) The farmers were led into the clutches of landlords and moneylenders.
- (II) contradicts (I)
- (II) is the reason for (I)
- (I) is true but (II) is false
- (I) and (II) are independent of each other.
Nationalism Growth
63 Likes
Answer
(II) is the reason for (I)
Explanation — Statement (I) is true. The British government imposed heavy land revenue and other taxes on farmers. This placed a great financial burden on them.
Statement (II) is also true. Because the farmers had to pay high revenue, many of them borrowed money from landlords and moneylenders. In this way, they fell into their clutches.
Thus, the exploitation by landlords and moneylenders was closely linked to the heavy tax burden imposed by the British.
Therefore, Statement (II) is the reason for Statement (I).
Answered By
39 Likes
Related Questions
He was a great humanist, who believed that service to mankind was service to God. Who was he?
- Jyotiba Phule
- Swami Dayanand Saraswati
- Raja Rammohan Roy
- Swami Vivekananda
(I) Although India had a long history going back to many centuries, it was never a single nation and comprised many kingdoms.
(II) The feeling of nationalism emerged during the British rule mainly as a reaction to the British rule.
- (II) contradicts (I)
- (II) is the reason for (I)
- (I) is true but (II) is false
- (I) and (II) are independent of each other
(I) All sections of Indian society gradually realised that their economic salvation lay in freeing themselves from the yoke of British rule.
(II) All sections of society came together on one platform to work towards their salvation.
- (II) contradicts (I)
- (II) is the reason for (I)
- (I) is true but (II) is false
- (I) and (II) are independent of each other.
(I) The social reformers launched a crusade against socio-religious evils prevalent in Indian society in the 19th century.
(II) Many newspapers and magazines in vernacular languages were launched.
- (II) contradicts (I)
- (II) is the reason for (I)
- (I) is true but (II) is false
- (I) and (II) are independent of each other.